IMI
Decision Infrastructure

A decision gets made. What happens next?

You're already recording your meetings. Those transcripts are a filing cabinet. IMI turns them into a decision constitution — the commitments your team has made, tracked over time, monitored for drift.

Talk to us See how it works
IMI / Decision Constitution
● 47 active decisions
All Decisions — Q1 2026
Active
Enterprise land at $1,500/mo, expand at $3,000+
Set Feb 14 · Confirmed in 3 calls · Referenced last week
Stale
Q1 onboarding managed by Jordan on CS team
Set Jan 8 · Jordan departed Mar 1 · Never reassigned
⚠ Contradicted
Delivery timeline: all features by March 31
Committed Feb 3 — scope change discussed Apr 2 conflicts
Active
No custom integrations in Year 1 contract scope
Set Dec 12 · Confirmed Feb 20 · No drift detected
Stale
Weekly check-ins every Tuesday at 10am with Sarah
Set Nov 4 · Last occurred 6 weeks ago · No reschedule found
Latest update — Apr 16
3 transcripts processed this week
4 new decisions added to constitution
2 existing commitments now stale
1 contradiction flagged — DRI notified
Contradiction: Delivery timeline
Committed Feb 3: all features by Mar 31. Apr 15 call with Meridian discussed pushing scope to Q2 — conflicts with original commitment. Review before next client touch.

Three ways decisions break down — and nobody catches it.

It's not a culture problem. It's a structural one. Your team makes decisions in every meeting. Most of them go stale, get contradicted, or drift — without anyone realizing it until the damage is done.

Decisions get made and then broken

Someone commits in one meeting. A different conversation goes a different direction. Nobody connects the dots. The project is green until someone discovers it's wildly off track.

The 'why' evaporates

Decisions lose their rationale over time. People re-debate settled questions or break rules they didn't know existed. The reasoning that made something the right call doesn't survive the meeting it was made in.

Context is siloed by person

The commitment that got contradicted happened in a meeting you weren't in. There's no system your whole team shares that has the full picture — across all your people, all your conversations, all at once.

Ready to turn your transcripts into a decision constitution?

How IMI works

Give us your transcripts — from whatever recording tool you already use. We build the decision infrastructure from there.

Connected sources
Zoom
Meet
Teams
+
any transcript
Z
Meridian Healthcare — Discovery Call
Apr 15 · 47 min · 4 participants · Zoom transcript
New
What did we just learn? Analyzing 47 min · 6,200 words
4
Decisions
2
Stale flags
7
Entities
Constitution updated
47 → 51 active decisions
Eastwick Group — QBR Prep
Apr 16 · 31 min · 3 participants · Meet transcript
New
What did we just learn? Analyzing 31 min · 4,100 words
2 transcripts processed today · 14 this week ● Live sync active

Step 1 — Ingest

Every meeting that lands — from whatever tool you already use — the system asks: what did we just learn?

IMI connects to Zoom, Teams, and Google Meet — and accepts transcripts from any tool your team already uses. No new behavior required. Every time a transcript arrives, the system analyzes it against the existing constitution: new decisions get added, stale commitments get flagged, contradictions surface. Your meetings don't change. What happens after them does.

Step 2 — Constitute

Decisions as living objects — not text in a folder

IMI extracts every decision, commitment, and rule your team has established and structures them as objects in the graph — with state, relationships, and temporal context. Not a transcript you'll scroll through once and forget. A map of what your organization has actually decided, and what's still true.

IMI / Commitment Health
83 decisions 61 active 15 stale 7 contradicted
Needs Attention
⚠ Contradicted
Delivery of Phase 1 features by March 31
Committed Feb 3 · Apr 15 call with Meridian referenced different scope — needs DRI review
⚠ Contradicted
Senior Partner involvement through close — committed to client in kickoff
Committed Jan 22 · David referenced resource constraints in Apr 8 internal call
Review Required
Stale
Weekly check-ins every Tuesday — agreed in kickoff
Set Nov 4 · Last occurred 6 weeks ago · No reschedule found
Stale
Interim status report to executive sponsor — "by end of Q1"
Q1 ended Mar 31 · Never delivered · Not referenced in any subsequent meeting
On Track · 61 decisions
Active
No custom integrations in Year 1 contract scope
Set Dec 12 · Confirmed Feb 20 · No drift detected
+ 60 more active decisions
Last updated 2 hours ago from 14 meetings Apr 1 – Apr 23, 2026

Step 3 — Track

Every commitment has a lifecycle. Active, stale, contradicted — you see exactly where things stand.

Not a transcript archive. A living view of what your team has committed to, and what state each commitment is actually in. The graph knows when a February decision was contradicted in April. It knows when a "temporary" choice was never revisited. It knows when two people made conflicting promises in separate meetings. This is the view you open before any high-stakes call — not to search, but to know.

Contradiction Detected
Meridian Healthcare engagement · flagged Apr 15
New
Original Decision — Feb 3

"Delivery of all Phase 1 features by March 31 — confirmed in executive planning session"

Confirmed in 3 subsequent calls
Recent Drift — Apr 15

"Sarah discussed pushing Phase 1 scope to Q2 — client open to the change, no objection raised"

Meridian weekly sync · Sarah M.
Relevant parties
SM
Sarah M. DRI
JR
James R. IC
The constitution flagged this — human judgment decides what to do

Step 4 — Act

When something drifts, the right people find out. When you need context, you ask — and get a full briefing, not a pile of transcripts.

When a commitment is contradicted, the right person gets notified — not a blast to the whole team, but a targeted flag to whoever can actually resolve it. And any time you need a read on where things stand, you ask: "Tell me about the quality of my open engagements." You get a structured briefing, not a wall of transcript text to scroll through. Copilot and Claude can query the same data via MCP — your existing tools don't get replaced, they get the context they were missing.

The transcript exists. The summary exists.
The commitment still got missed.

You're already recording everything. Your AI assistant can find things in those recordings. But finding what was said isn't the same as knowing what was decided — or catching it when that decision quietly stops being true.

Your recording tool
Captures what was said

The transcript is there. You can search it, summarize it, share it. What it can't tell you: whether what was decided in that meeting is still the operating reality, or whether something changed.

Your AI assistant
Answers questions you think to ask

Copilot can find things — in meetings you attended. It doesn't have a view across your whole team, and it won't tell you unprompted that a commitment from last quarter is now being contradicted.

IMI
Knows what was decided — and whether it still is

The constitution tracks every decision across every meeting, every person. When something drifts, it catches it. Copilot and Claude can query the same graph — your tools don't get replaced, they get context they didn't have before.

Give us 90 days of transcripts. In the first week, we'll show you what's drifting.

Schedule a demo

What this unlocks for your team

Coherence

Your decisions stay alive

Commitments, rationale, and context survive as structured objects — not text in a folder someone will never open again. When someone leaves, nothing leaves with them.

Foresight

Know what needs attention before the meeting

Stale commitments, contradictions, and zombie decisions flagged before they cause problems — not after the QBR goes sideways. One stale commitment caught early pays for months of IMI.

Infrastructure

Your Copilot gets smarter

Any AI tool queries the graph via MCP — Copilot, Claude, whatever your team uses. Not another app competing for attention. The layer underneath. You keep your workflow; it just works better.

Not another recording tool. Not another AI assistant. The decision infrastructure underneath — built from transcripts you're already capturing.

IMI

See it with your own decisions

Give us your last 90 days of transcripts — from whatever tool you already use. In the first week, we'll show you decisions that went stale, commitments that were contradicted, and temporary choices that were never revisited. The ROI demonstrates itself.

No credit card. No commitment. Bring your transcripts — we'll show you what's drifting.

Working with consulting firms, agencies, and SaaS CS teams who are already recording — and ready to turn those transcripts into something structural.